Three cornerstones underpin the existence of the UN: Maintaining world peace, protecting human rights and ensuring social-economic development. Experience at the UN  has unfortunately shown us that due  to Intense politicization and powerful national interests and  the dynamics of the debate, the international community’s goal  to bring peace and safeguard human rights will probably not be attained through the world body.. It should come as no surprise, therefore, that the organization constantly re-examines its goals in light of the persistent gap between developed and developing nations and the inherent tension between the “better world” it strives to build (to which many relate cynically) and national interests.

Social-economic development is the one field in which the organization has established itself as an influential global player. Its 2000 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) ,revised in the 2015 blueprint for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which has become a guiding concept for global development and human progress, are  the most prominent expressions of the organization’s success in re-inventing itself in this aspect. Global development challenges necessitate international cooperation, for which the UN can and should serve as a worthy platform.

Israel has a history of complex relations with the UN. For years, the dismissive attitude toward the world body famously coined by David Ben-Gurion – “um shmum” – reflected Israeli strategy vis-à-vis the organization. Its suspicion and mistrust of the organization stemmed from its view of the multilateral arena as hostile to Israel. At the same time, Israel is a living  example of a state that despite defense and sustainable development  challenges  evolved from a developing to a developed nation, a prosperous and stable state, a world leader in innovation, science and technology, agriculture, water, health, defence  and security. Israel constitutes a “developments laboratory and a model for other countries on tackling development challenges. Its success stories in these fields are an asset and “entry ticket” into the global league of the UN’s development diplomacy.

The year 2000 was a turning point in terms of Israel’s standing at the UN. Its designation as a developed nation and acceptance into the WEOG group (Western Europe and Others) UN member states allowed Israel to integrate and become more active and present in the organization. Israeli diplomacy identified the opportunity to shake off the diplomatic “zero sum game” equation focused on the Israeli-Arab conflict in favor of integrating into the UN agenda as an valuable player and “shareholder” in the organization. Israel’s wise decision to deploy its “soft power” in the multilateral arena contributed to all facets of its national resilience: Diplomatic, security and economic.

The conceptual shift was translated into measures that strengthened Israel’s international standing. At Israel’s instigation, the UN General Assembly annually adopts, since 2007 majority vote resolutions on “agrotechnology for development” and “entrepreneurship for development”. Its hydrologists and experts on food security, innovation, technology and counterterrorism are routinely invited to share their experience with the UN. A series of agreements between Israel and various UN bodies constitutes a global professional cooperation framework. Israeli representatives are appointed to UN posts and the organization provides a conduit for Israel into new world markets. This changed paradigm does not ignore the diplomatic challenge Israel faces at the UN, which will continue to color its position within the organization. However, Israel is also reaping the diplomatic, economic and security fruit of its broader engagement with the UN beyond the Middle East conflict, which effectively serves its image and foreign policy goals.

Israel’s relations with the UN are complex, problematic and sometimes frustrating. The UN’s mission to reshape the global order provides Israel with an opportunity to deepen its cooperation with the organization even as diplomatic disagreements remain unresolved. Israel must continue to advance a new diplomatic strategy toward the UN, shake off the complexes of the past and adopt conduct and a proactive approach as a full-fledged member state, shareholder and stakeholder involved in reshaping the world order.

The article was published by The Jerusalem Post on 11 July 2020

הפוסט Israel Should Deepen its Engagement with the UN הופיע לראשונה ב-Mitvim.

In addition to staying in touch and looking after these Israelis and their families, the MFA, as always, is engaged in other aspects of the national effort to curb the spread of the disease. Missions abroad, with support from headquarters in Jerusalem, are busy locating manufacturers of vital equipment, and in many cases coordinating its transport to Israel. From respirators to antibacterial gel, from protective gear to overalls, from face masks to raw materials for the pharmaceutical industry. To overcome the limitations and restrictions placed by countries on the export of medical equipment at this time, Israeli representatives are required to pull strings, locate suppliers and to the extent necessary, obtain special export licenses. Some embassies hook up foreign and Israeli scientists in order to share experience and help the drive for scientific breakthroughs to stem the pandemic. Understandably, this has become the daily bread and butter of Israeli missions during these times.

To back these efforts, the MFA has announced a “national emergency rescue plan” to bring Israelis home. The decision to designate the MFA as an essential workplace, following an appeal by the Foreign Minister to reverse a previous government decision on the matter, is a welcome move. It allows the ministry to work on full emergency footing in missions abroad and at 50% capacity in Israel. The MFA headquarters plays a vital role in the overall diplomatic endeavors. Formulating policy and implementing it through instructions to the field, running a complex system of some 100 representative offices, managing human resources and ensuring the necessary security requires a fully functioning main office. The decision to exclude the MFA from near total lockdown testifies to the recognition of its vital task and underscores the need for a strong and significant Foreign Ministry as an integral part of the national effort.

The essential role of the MFA in emergencies is not new. One of my earliest memories of work at the ministry was the massive activity during the 1973 Yom Kippur War in mobilizing reserve soldiers traveling abroad and whisking them home. I also remember well the activation of Israeli missions in obtaining essential input for the economy. Along with these tasks, the MFA continued to carry out its “traditional” roles, among them mobilizing diplomatic support in international arenas and blocking initiatives to curtail Israel’s military room for maneuver, as well as conducting public diplomacy to boost favorable world public opinion.

The need for an active and accessible Foreign Service is growing. We live in an era of globalization and global challenges the solutions for which cross borders – from countering terrorism to fighting epidemics. In light of the above, Israel must ensure an active physical presence in international forums, personal acquaintance with and access to decision makers in all sectors, and experience with a large number of international arenas. This cannot be accomplished by remote control. The personal dimension – the ongoing personal contact – is an irreplaceable added value of the Foreign Service which enables both public diplomacy and “political intelligence”. Preparation for the day after the Coronavirus crisis is also important – to ensure continuity and prevent the current exigencies from undermining future needs. Once the storm abates, we will require stable infrastructure for economic recovery and growth in the international arena, too. That obviously means having a strong Foreign Ministry in normal times and in emergency situations as well.

The MFA has a key role in ensuring Israel’s national resilience. Nonetheless, as mentioned by a former senior defense official against the backdrop of the current crisis, the Ministry has been weakened in recent years and its budgets slashed (he mentioned the Health Ministry in the same breath but that is an issue for another discussion). Indeed, the status of the MFA has suffered persistent, severe and debilitating erosion in recent years at the initiative of the government. Budgets and responsibilities were shifted to other agencies for unjustified political reasons. This must be rectified at once by the new government, no matter who is at its helm.

A September 2019 Mitvim Institute poll indicated that 48% of Israelis think the MFA’s status has declined. Of these, more respondents (30%) think this downgrading significantly undermines national security than those who think it does not (18%). The importance that the public attributes to diplomacy and foreign policy is encouraging considering its insufficient awareness of the wide array of matters with which the MFA deals. The extent to which the public understands the link between the correct conduct of foreign policy and National Security (national resilience) is also encouraging. Leaders of the state, too, must recognize the need to strengthen the MFA and translate this recognition into practical terms. A strong Foreign Ministry, backed in practice by the government that it represents throughout the world, is vital under every scenario, whether in routine times or emergencies.

The MFA may not being doing enough in terms of domestic public relations. It will not tweet about “clandestine nighttime operations” that take place, and will not make public every security or civilian deal involving an Israeli ambassador. Our diplomats, men and women, hold thousands of meetings, public and private, with leaders, opinion shapers, captains of industry and others to ensure Israel’s security, and its economic and social prosperity both in normal times and in emergencies. The MFA staff operate with humility, discretion and determination, often under the radar, sometimes even in countries with which Israel does not have diplomatic relations, often under complex security conditions for themselves and their families. The Foreign Minister was right in publicly praising the Ministry’s work everywhere. It is important that the political echelons back his declarations, translate them into action, and restore responsibilities and proper budgets to the MFA.

In times of wars and military operations, the MFA places its capabilities at the disposal of the state to provide a “temporary diplomatic window” enabling completion of a military campaign. The current crisis, with its unique and different characteristics, creates new and unfamiliar challenges for the state. Addressing them requires activity abroad, too, which brings into play the capacities and capabilities of the MFA. The last thing the government should be doing now is adopting the recommendations of bean counters who define the MFA as a non-essential agency. Adopting such a classification, continuing to undermine its authority and stealing its budgets will distance our potential future diplomats, and harm – you guessed it – the State of Israel.

(originally published in Haaretz)

הפוסט The Foreign Ministry on the Frontlines of the Coronavirus Crisis הופיע לראשונה ב-Mitvim.